new/delete overloading, why?

From: Henrik Nordstr�m <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:28:04 +0200

Why are we overloading new/delete with xmalloc/xfree?

include/SquidNew.h

this is causing "random" linking issues every time some piece of code
forgets to include SquidNew.h, especially when building helpers etc. And
I fail to see what benefit we get from overloading the new/delete
operators in this way.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Fri Aug 20 2010 - 12:28:08 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstr�m: "Re: [PREVIEW] 1xx response forwarding"
Previous message: noc_at_squid-cache.org: "Build failed in Hudson: 3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #765"
Next in thread: Robert Collins: "Re: new/delete overloading, why?"
Reply: Robert Collins: "Re: new/delete overloading, why?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 21 2010 - 12:00:04 MDT