On 06/24/2011 08:28 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 24/06/11 13:53, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 24/06/11 05:23, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
>>> I have some other problems probably with this patch.
>>>
>>> Currently trying to use a parent cache does not work for me.
>>> I am testing the configuration with older squid trees and I have not any
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> Did the configuration parameters changed? Are there changes I should
>>> take care about?
>>>
>>
>> No changes to the peer config or expected behaviour. The only thing
>> remotely related is reduction in pconn pooled for each one. And that
>> peer selection ends with DNS lookup Comm::Connection creation.
>>
>> There are some bugs that have popped out of the background completely
>> unexpected related to the HTTP request text generated.
>>
>> http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3247
>> I'm on this right now.
>
> Fixed. This had side-effects in all cache_peer dependent logics. So very
> likely your problem is now fixed too.
OK using a parent cache works well now.
>
>>
>> http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3252
>> is this related to the maybeReadVirginBody() patch Alex comitted a few
>> hours ago?
>>
>> http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3253
>> Plan on getting to this next if nobody else beats me to it. Not exactly
>> a regression on earlier, but was supposed to be fixed by the new changes.
>
> Seems not to exist any more. Though not exactly sure why.
The bug 3252 is still here.....
>
>
> Amos
Received on Fri Jun 24 2011 - 09:16:11 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 24 2011 - 12:00:05 MDT