keepaliveNextRequest: abandoning FD

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:01:57 -0700

Hello,

    I see thousands of these messages on busy caches:

> 2011/11/07 05:16:23 kid1| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest: abandoning FD 6650
> 2011/11/07 05:16:27 kid3| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest: abandoning FD 9180
> 2011/11/07 05:16:28 kid5| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest: abandoning FD 6361
> 2011/11/07 05:16:28 kid6| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest: abandoning FD 3322
> 2011/11/07 05:16:31 kid2| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest: abandoning FD 7809
> 2011/11/07 05:16:32 kid3| client_side.cc(1573) keepaliveNextRequest: abandoning FD 121

The code says:

> // XXX: Can this happen? CONNECT tunnels have deferredRequest set.
> debugs(33, DBG_IMPORTANT, HERE << "abandoning " << conn->clientConnection);

So, the answer to that XXX question is "yes, it can happen", at least in
older v3.2 code. Does anybody know whether there were any recent changes
that were meant to address the above?

Can we raise the debugging level away from DBG_IMPORTANT now that we
know the answer?

Thank you,

Alex.
Received on Thu Nov 10 2011 - 22:02:15 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Nov 11 2011 - 12:00:10 MST