Re: [PATCH] Refactor ufscommon into individual include/code files

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:09:59 +1200

On 06.08.2012 03:56, Kinkie wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
> wrote:
>> On 5/08/2012 12:22 a.m., Kinkie wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> v2 addresses (or at least triest to) address all your
>>> suggestions,
>>> plus it changes DBG_CRITICAL and DBG_IMPORTANT across the whole
>>> source,
>>
>>
>> Hmm. okay. I was only requesting the new added/modified lines for
>> now. The
>> source-wide should probably be done as a separate update which can
>> be ported
>> to 3.2 later.
>
> It should be possible to cherrypick that specific revision from the
> feature-branch, it's all done in one commit, or I can simply
> reproduce
> (it's a regex-replace in eclipse, after all)

Okay. Please do then. +10 on that by itself.

>
>>> and changes CBDATA_CLASS* positions everywhere.
>>
>>
>> Does Squid still build fine? Last time I tried to move one it failed
>> to
>> build cleanly afterwards. I'm not entirely confident we have
>> unit-test
>> coverage to test them all either.
>
> Yes, it does. They're just a few (half a dozen, maybe). Also, most
> are
> CBDATA_CLASS which don't play the same private: trickery as
> CBDATA_CLASS2.
>
>> Was only asking to mark them for later attention so they are easy to
>> find
>> again.
>
> Whoops, I misunderstood. Should I revert?

Easy to cherrypick as well? Since you've already done the work I see no
reason not to merge it to trunk as a stand-alone commit just in case
anything goes badly afterwards.

Amos
Received on Sun Aug 05 2012 - 22:10:07 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 06 2012 - 12:00:06 MDT