Re: [PATCH] Do not chunk Content-Range responses

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:28:30 +1200

On 24/08/2012 4:30 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When Squid forwards a response with a Content-Range header,
> ClientSocketContext::socketState() detects the end of the response
> range(s) and returns STREAM_*COMPLETE to
> ClientSocketContext::writeComplete(). The latter thinks that the writing
> of the response to the client must be over and calls
> keepaliveNextRequest() instead of writing the last-chunk (if any). If
> the to-client response was chunked, the client gets stuck waiting for
> that missing last-chunk.
>
> The multipart Range request case was already excluded from chunking (or
> it would probably suffer from the same problem). With this change, no
> Content-Range responses will be chunked.
>
> N.B. Some servers send Content-Range responses to basic GET requests
> without a Range header, so the problem affects more than just Range
> requests.
>
> A proper fix would be to rewrite ClientSocketContext::writeComplete()
> and other code so that it does not mix internal ClientStream completion
> with [possibly chunk-encoded] writing completion. This should probably
> be done along with fixing ClientSocketContext::socketState() and other
> state-checking code to ignore to-client persistence
> (flags.proxy_keepalive), which is not related to the internal
> ClientStream state. Those changes are too big and too potentially
> disruptive to be included in this fix though. Patches welcome.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alex.

+1.

Can you mark that comment in the code with a FIXME or similar please so
we don't loose track of it for later.

Amos
Received on Fri Aug 24 2012 - 10:28:42 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 24 2012 - 12:00:12 MDT