Re: [PATCH] Raw data debugging

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:04:11 +1300

On 14/12/2012 1:54 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The attached patch adds Raw, an std::ostream manipulator to print
> possibly non-terminated buffers and their labels/sizes.
>
> The Raw manipulator tries to be smart about printing buffers at various
> debugging levels: Large buffers are only printed at DBG_DATA by default.
> This allows the caller to mix higher-level debug messages with dumping
> of potentially large volumes of data. This smartness can be overruled
> using an explicit minLevel() method call.
>
>
> I think this manipulator can be useful in many places. The next patch I
> will post illustrates such usage for helper debugging.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alex.

How are these two different?

   debugs(0,9, " label: " << StringArea(buf, 10));

   debugs(0,9, "" << Raw("label", buf, 10));

Raw() would be elegant if it were inherited by buffer objects needing to
print their data as debugs(0,9, buf). But otherwise this is just making
a duplicate of the string+length object. We already have StringArea for
C++ and lstring for C code, MemBuf in a fashion for raw buffers, and
will have StringNG shortly as well.

Amos
Received on Fri Dec 14 2012 - 02:04:16 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 14 2012 - 12:00:10 MST