Re: Default behavior for --enable-esi?

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:20:27 +0100

tor 2012-12-27 klockan 13:38 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:

> IIRC it is still off because it is not wanted by many installations and
> adds a large footprint to the binary. The more useful
> surrogate-capabilities sub-component is auto-enabled on reverse-proxy
> traffic regardless of ESI.

Plus still experimental, and no active maintainer familiar with the
code.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Thu Dec 27 2012 - 06:20:31 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 27 2012 - 12:00:24 MST