Re: [PATCH] StoreId with couple cosmetics in sync with trunk 1639

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:23:23 -0700

On 02/06/2013 08:45 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> This audit round all appear to be documentation an debugs polish. Any
> objection to me applying those changes and comitting?

None from me, especially if you can remove code duplication that Eliezer
cannot (the still unaddressed issue from the previous review).

Thank you,

Alex.
Received on Thu Feb 07 2013 - 16:23:32 MST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alex Rousskov: "Re: [PATCH] Make squid -z for cache_dir rock work like UFS, not COSS"
Previous message: Eliezer Croitoru: "Re: [PATCH] StoreId with couple cosmetics in sync with trunk 1639"
In reply to: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [PATCH] StoreId with couple cosmetics in sync with trunk 1639"
Next in thread: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [PATCH] StoreId with couple cosmetics in sync with trunk 1639"
Reply: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [PATCH] StoreId with couple cosmetics in sync with trunk 1639"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 08 2013 - 12:00:07 MST