Re: [PATCH] AND and OR ACLs

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 15:59:19 +1200

On 14/05/2013 11:19 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
> Just to conclude this discussion: I have removed rechecks. It was
> difficult, but I could not stand the idea that a large portion of the
> ACL expression tree, with all its growing complexity, may be rescanned
> on every slow ACL lookup. I am going to post the new patch shortly.

Yay!. Reading it now...

Amos
Received on Tue May 14 2013 - 03:59:26 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [PATCH] AND and OR ACLs v15"
Previous message: Amos Jeffries: "Re: squid wont start due to missing log_file_daemon."
In reply to: Alex Rousskov: "Re: [PATCH] AND and OR ACLs"
Next in thread: Alex Rousskov: "[PATCH] AND and OR ACLs v15"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 14 2013 - 12:00:09 MDT