Re: [PATCH] reply_from_cache and reply_to_cache

On 10/14/2013 09:28 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> Another idea is whether to add a name= parameter to the cache_dir and
> have "cache X allow/deny ..." rules per storage area. To go a little
> further than min/max object sizes.

I think the above should be done by adding cache_dir (and memory cache)
matching ACLs instead of a mandatory "cache X" parameter naming a
cache_dir (or memory cache).

Alex.
Received on Tue Oct 15 2013 - 14:19:02 MDT