Re: [PATCH] Destroy ACLs in the reverse order of creation

On 11/30/2013 12:24 PM, Kinkie wrote:
>>> I think we really should be ref-counting these pointers to make it a bit
>>> more flexible and ensure that they do not get erased while in use.
>>
>> Yes, of course. Refcounting would also improve the
>> AclMatchedName-related code significantly. I cannot volunteer to do the
>> required legwork at this time, unfortunately.
>>
>>
>>> +0. I have no objections for this going in now while we consider the above.
>>
>> Will commit soon unless somebody else finds a reason not to.

Done as trunk r13165.

> Please do commit but add an XXX remembering the future us to do the
> refcount legwork.

Done as trunk r13166.

Thank you,

Alex.
Received on Mon Dec 02 2013 - 00:44:14 MST