Re: [RFC] unified port directive

From: Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:09:51 +0200

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Alex Rousskov
<rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> On 06/08/2014 11:07 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> I propose that we combine the http_port and https_port directives into
>> a single directive called "port" with the old names as aliases and an
>> option to select between TCP and TLS transport protocol.
>
> Just "port" is a bad name, IMO, because there are many other, non-HTTP
> *_ports in squid.conf. Consider using "http_port" name for both SSL and
> plain transports, with appropriate transport defaults (that may even
> depend on the port value!).

How about "listen"? It's consistent with apache, clear, and protocol-neutral.

Kinkie
Received on Tue Jun 10 2014 - 06:10:02 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 10 2014 - 12:00:11 MDT