Re: restricting sex oriented material

From: Umar Goldeli <>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 16:43:09 -0500 (EST)

> And no, you're not going to block *ALL* sex sites, and unless you have a
> news reading daemon blocking sites for you, you won't even block all the
> sites your users will find with obscure names and numbers for filenames.
> Blocking major sites just reduces cache efficiency by forcing your users
> to smaller sites (or even worse, to many different mirrors of said,
> blocked, site).
> To say blocking major sex sites saves bandwidth is a misconception (at
> least, with our userbase it would be).

ahah... maybe we're all considering this from the wrong perspective...
maybe we all should start LOCAL porn sites?


we could set up a Squid Porn hierarchy... perhaps each of us can take a
different category and should all use ICP and form NAP's etc and use BGP..


Received on Tue Jun 03 1997 - 22:54:16 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:35:21 MST