Re: Fetching from Parent slower than direct ??

From: Tom Minchin <tom@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 09:51:03 +1000 (EST)

> On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Tom Minchin wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Without more details its hard to say exactly what the problem could be.
> > > I don't suppose there are UDP filters between you and your parent caches?
> > >
> > > You might want to try a configuration like this:
> > >
> > > cache_host sib1 sibling 8080 3130
> > > cache_host sib2 sibling 8080 3130
> > > cache_host p1 parent 8080 0 no-query default
> > > cache_host p2 parent 8080 0 no-query default
> > >
> > Does this work differently than 'round-robin'? Ideally, I'd like it to
> > always go to p1 (by default) and if p1 is unavailable, then default to
> > p2. This way we could have backup default parents.
> try putting weight=10 after your prefered parent

So a 'weight' will still work even though we're not using ICP?

tom@interact.net.au
Received on Tue Jul 08 1997 - 16:53:27 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:35:42 MST