Re: Squid 1.2beta11 on digital unix 4.0b

Actually, to the best of my knowledge, these are as yet undocumented.

UTSL (Use The Source, Luke), that's what I did.

D

Edwin Culp wrote:

> Dancer wrote:
> >
> > inside_firewall no longer exists in 1.2.
> >
> > Use always_direct and never_direct. They work much like http_access.
> >
> > eg: never_direct allow all
> >
> > is the same as: inside_firewall none
> >
> > never_direct allow !localdomain
> >
> > (where localdomain is an ACL for your err..local domain) will go direct for
> > anything in localdomain and via a parent or sibling for anything else.
> >
> > If you use refresh_pattern/i I believe you'll find that it's become
> > 'refresh_pattern -i'
> >
> > D
> >
> > Ong Beng Hui wrote:
> >
> > > > >I 'll try to install squid 1.2 beta 11 on a digital unix 4.0b and i have
> > > > >some error (at the end of the mail):
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > >/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-dec-osf3.2/2.7.2.1/include/time.h:167,
> > > >
> > > > Your OS is 4.0b, but your GCC installation is OSF3.2. You'll
> > > > need to reinstall GCC, or perhaps try the native OSF C complier.
> > > >
> > > > setenv CC='cc'
> > > > ./configure ...
> > >
> > > Just compiled Squid1.2b11 (without patch) cleanly on DU 4.0D (878).
> > > But couldn't get inside_firewall to work yet.
> > >
> > > It's seems that Squid compile best on GCC, but the DEC CC.
> >
> > --
> > Did you read the documentation AND the FAQ?
> > If not, I'll probably still answer your question, but my patience will
> > be limited, and you take the risk of sarcasm and ridicule.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> I've got my asbestos suit on:-) Where can I find documentation about
> these and other options in 1.2beta?
>
> Thanks
>
> ed

--
Did you read the documentation AND the FAQ?
If not, I'll probably still answer your question, but my patience will
be limited, and you take the risk of sarcasm and ridicule.