Re:

From: Dancer <dancer@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 00:25:47 +1000

Cristian Diaconu wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Apr 1998, Dancer wrote:
>
> > It means that (for whatever reason) all the redirector processes you had
> > running terminated, or crashed. If they all do, squid will shut itself
> > down out of sympathy.
> >
> > D
> >
> >
> > Cristian Diaconu wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can someone tell me where the f@#@$ this error:
> > > "FATAL: All redirectories have exited!" comes from when starting
> > > SQUID1-1.21??
> > >
> > > Thx a lot !
> > > dya@vega.dsp.pub.ro
> >
> > --
> > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> > Version: 3.1
> > GAT d- s++: a C++++$ UL++++B+++S+++C++H++U++V+++$ P+++$ L+++ E-
> > W+++(--)$ N++ w++$>--- t+ 5++ X+() R+ tv b++++ DI+++ e- h-@
> > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> >
> >
>
> Yes, but why the redirectories are exiting could be a bad http port
> number? (yet an error I have recently discovered and tryin' to correct).
> Would a conf file help you to understand why are the redirectories
> exiting?
> Thx.
> dya@vega.dsp.pub.ro

I shouldn't think so. The redirectors have nothing to do with the http
port. I am assuming that you actually have redirectors written, and that
they have been tested and work?

D

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT d- s++: a C++++$ UL++++B+++S+++C++H++U++V+++$ P+++$ L+++ E-
W+++(--)$ N++ w++$>--- t+ 5++ X+() R+ tv b++++ DI+++ e- h-@ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Received on Fri Apr 24 1998 - 07:32:21 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:39:56 MST