Re: 1.2 Cache Size (again)

From: Mark Cooke <mpc@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 18:38:07 +0100 (BST)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 29 May 1998, Duane Wessels wrote:

> It looks really unhealthy. I suggest recompiling without async-io.
> I doubt you really need it (your cache is pretty small).
>
> Otherwise, consider upgrading something on your linux installation.
> kernel, libc, something.

Aye. I might give glibc 2.1 a whirl in the nearish future, though I'm
back to non-async for now.

Thanks for your time, Duane.

Mark

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Mark Cooke The views expressed above are mine and are not
Systems Programmer necessarily representative of university policy
University Of Birmingham URL: http://www.sr.bham.ac.uk/~mpc/
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNW7yinlbx4ZElNuLEQLrtQCgpKWiSSkNB9t2pKpAJUPDbiddJksAoLJS
+g105dhA3zZOR2h5nW1k+Rly
=MIQW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Fri May 29 1998 - 10:43:07 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:40:30 MST