Re: Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches.

From: B. Richardson <rabtter@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 22:26:48 -0400 (EDT)

squid

Barrett Richardson rabtter@orion.aye.net

On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Alex Rousskov wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, B. Richardson wrote:
>
> > I am theorizing that if a large proportion of files are 4k or less,
> > then 4k is a better choice for block size than 8k.
>
> What are you trying to optimize?
>
> Alex.
>
>
Received on Mon Jul 20 1998 - 19:26:35 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alex Rousskov: "Re: Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches."
Previous message: Andrew Specht: "more on ftp failing!!!"
In reply to: Alex Rousskov: "Re: Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches."
Next in thread: Alex Rousskov: "Re: Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches."
Reply: Alex Rousskov: "Re: Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:41:12 MST