> >I've observed filedescriptor usage way in excess of 1.2b20 when running
> >1.2b23+patches, but haven't had a chance to determine the actual cause
> >yet. It may well be normal behaviour.
>
> 1.2 should use more filedescriptors than 1.1 did. The reason is
> that 1.2 writes objects to the disk *as* they are being downloaded,
> whereas 1.1 waits until the download is complete.
I realise that, but should 1.2b23+patch1 use more file descriptors than
1.2b20 did? Twice now our caches have run out of descriptors under 1.2b23
whereas they run for weeks with 1.2b20.
Unfortunately I've not had a chance to debug it any further as yet, so
I've backed out to 1.2b20 for the moment :-(
Regards,
Bob Purdon,
Technical Manager,
Southern Internet Services.
Received on Tue Jul 28 1998 - 16:39:45 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:41:17 MST