Re: Transparent with 2.0.35

From: Apiset Tananchai <aet@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 14:52:28 +0700 (ICT)

Make sure that you enable all these options:

CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
CONFIG_INET
CONFIG_FIREWALL
CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL
CONFIG_IP_TRANSPARENT_PROXY

I'm using 2.0.35 here without any problem.

--
aet
On Fri, 21 Aug 1998, Andrew Hall wrote:
> Kernel config is exactly the same although there seems to be no transparent
> proxy option in the kernel build config now... Whereas there was in 2.0.34
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Andrew.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean McDonald <dean@connect.com.au>
> To: Andrew Hall <aah@impaq.net.au>
> Cc: squid-users@ircache.net <squid-users@ircache.net>; dean@connect.com.au
> <dean@connect.com.au>
> Date: Friday, 21 August 1998 9:36
> Subject: Re: Transparent with 2.0.35
> 
> 
> >hi,
> >
> >As far as I know transparent proxy wasn't touched at all between
> >2.0.34 and .35 ,  is your 35 kernel configuration exactly the same?.
> >
> >(you could also try without the 3k fd patch)
> >
> >that's all I can think of off-hand.
> >
> >
> >Dean.
Received on Mon Aug 24 1998 - 00:43:39 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:41:41 MST