RE: Squid 2 - so what? ;-)

From: Nottingham, Mark (Australia) <mark_nottingham@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 10:20:20 +1000

For me, the key points are:

* HTTP 1.1 compliance (aware of Cache-Control: headers)
* more efficient
* cache digests (neighbor caches can predict what their peers will have)
* cache directories are configured on a per-disk basis; much more robust

YMMV.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Marowsky-Brée [mailto:lmb@pointer.teuto.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 1998 7:44 AM
> To: squid-users@ircache.net
> Subject: Squid 2 - so what? ;-)
>
>
> I know,
>
> this question is mostly useless. But what are the killing
> features of the new
> v2? I found way too complete changelogs, but nothing which
> highlights what
> really makes the upgrade worthwhile...
>
> I can't go around upgrading code on our servers just because
> I feel like it
> ;-)
>
> Sincerely,
> Lars Marowsky-Brée
>
> --
> Lars Marowsky-Brée
> Network Management
>
> teuto.net Netzdienste GmbH - DPN Verbund-Partner
>
Received on Wed Oct 07 1998 - 17:27:06 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:42:22 MST