Re: no_chache directive

Ah. Thanks for that. That explains the unpurgable objects I kept finding, usually clustered around
particular sites.
You are probably right about the perl version so long as it is written carefully, which yours is.

Andrew.

Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Nov 1998, Jens-S. Voeckler wrote:
>
> > This leads me to a question: Would it be safe to remove() those files, for
> > which the PURGE query results in a
>
> You may end up removing PRIVATE objects that are being fetched at the time of
> the PURGE query. Private objects have a different store key, and Squid
> responds with 404. Usually, private objects become public or are released
> from the cache eventually.
>
> An object that could not be purged could be in at lease three states:
> - private object being fetched
> - released but not yet unlinked objects (free FD cache)
> - lost objects if any (a bug)
>
> Alex.

-- 
Dr. Andrew Smith                     Any OPINIONS expressed are
Network Development                  mine and do not necessarily
Prentice Centre                      reflect the views of the
University of Queensland             University of Qld.
Australia, 4072.
email: ccasmith@prentice.uq.edu.au
phone: 07 336 57408