deny !Safe_ports, any critical reasons? (abuse..)

From: Herwig Wittmann <herwig@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 23:24:46 +0100 (CET)

Hello people, [1]

Are there any real bad things (tm) users authorized to use a squid cache
could do if I would replace the default Safe_ports acl with
something like "acl Safe_ports 1-65535"?

--- snip - squid.conf ---
acl Safe_ports port 80 21 443 563 70 210 1025-65535
http_access deny !Safe_ports
--- snap ---

xxx
Herwig Wittmann <herwig@atnet.at>

[1] Usual apologies apply if this posting should be inapropriate -
I joined this ML two days ago, but my fellow coworkers at our isp
want me to remove the mentioned default restriction, so I decided
to post right now :P
Received on Wed Jan 06 1999 - 15:06:56 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:43:55 MST