Re: (no-digest -> no-query) incompatible with keep-alive?

On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> David J N Begley wrote:
>
> > Having run for just over two weeks after converting some peers from
> > "no-digest" to "no-query" (ie., using cache digests exclusively, no ICP),
> > it's clear that something's "not quite right" on the persistent connection
[...]
> Is this a parent or a sibling relation?

Both - on one proxy, I have a single parent/child CD-only relationship, two
sibling CD-only relationships and two sibling ICP-only relationships.

> If it is a sibling relation then you may be experiencing problems with
> false hits.
[...]
> False hits is considered by Squid as an error, and currently any
> errors causes the connection to be non-persistent.

Ahh.. rats. Oh well, at least that makes sense - thanks.

Alex Rousskov wrote:
> Right. Looks like to improve pconns life time we need to build, a
> close-or-not-to-close-on-error decision table. For example, false hit does
> not have to close a connection to a valid peer, while request parsing error
> should close. More exceptions. Sigh.

Sorry, Alex. ;-)

dave
Received on Sun Aug 01 1999 - 22:25:04 MDT