TCP_HIT vs TCP_MEM_HIT speed.

From: Greg Maxwell <gmaxwell@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 08:43:28 -0500 (EST)

I apologize if this has been asked before here, I havn't been on the list
and I couldn't find the answer in an archive search.

I'm using Calamaris 2.27 on a small (500megs, on a P5 Linux box) Version
2.2.STABLE5 Squid. As always, Squid performs wonderfully.

Looking at my Calamaris output I see:

     TCP_HIT 10383 25.25 48853 26.84 0 97.95
     TCP_MEM_HIT 653 1.59 1395 0.77 0 46.21

It kind of puzzles me that MEM_HIT is slower the TCP_HIT, as I though that
MEM_HITs were hot objects and the others were off disk?

Do I have something out of tune, or is Calamaris confusing me?

[Please CC me on replyes because I won't be subscribed for long]

--
The comments and opinions expressed herein are those of the author of this 
message and may not reflect the policies of the Martin County Board of
County Commissioners.
Received on Mon Feb 07 2000 - 06:58:15 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:50:59 MST