Re: [SQU] load-balancing using squid and cisco

But afaik, WCCP v1 is only good for port 80 traffic, i.e. for transparent proxying. If you aren't currently forcing your customers through a cache or have their proxy settings on another port, WCCP v1 won't see the http request

The other alternative, which is reported to work equally good, is Layer 4 port forwarding with fail-over/load-balancing.

On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 07:06:51AM -0500, Joe Cooper wrote:
#> Yes. WCCP v1 allows redirect-lists to define what subnets or host IP's
#> are sent to the cache.
#>
#> Christian Schmit wrote:
#> >
#> > Does WCCP v1 also provide me with the option to only
#> > redirect trafic to the cache servers originating from
#> > a specified range of IP adresses or does all trafic
#> > passing the interface wccp runs on get redirected to the
#> > caching servers.
#> >
#> > I have an ATM/STM-1 connection with 2 pvc's over which
#> > trafic will enter my network.
#> >
#> > Christian
#>
#>
#> --
#> Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
#> Affordable Web Caching Proxy Appliances
#> http://www.swelltech.com

-- 
Med vennlig hilsen / Best Regards                               
Shaun Jurrens (System Administrator)                 
World Online Norge AS  
Postboks 598, Skøyen 
N-0277 Oslo - Norway                    
--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html