RE: [SQU] squid 2.4pre and reiserfs

> anyone else running squid 2.4 with the caches on reiserfs
> filesystems...
> should I be using aufs instead of ufs... for the filesystem
> type in the
> cache-dir line...
>
> right now it seems stable and fast enough (it running on my
> test rather
> than production cache boxes), if it stays that way I may roll
> it out to
> some 3 million page a day boxes...

I did so about 6 months ago but had to revert since at the time
reiserfs had (hard lockup) problems on SMP boxes.

You might want to have a look at Joe Cooper's reiserfs_raw (check
the mailing list archives)

-- 
	/kinkie 
--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html