RE: [squid-users] capacity of squid

Hi,

Haven't tried Squid in comination with Reiser FS, only the UFS standard. As
it is becoming really sloooooooooooow lately, I will reinstall with ReiserFS
this weekend. Tell you guys on Monday if it helps. Most likely, my users
will tell mne before I can test anything anyway. But that's why we have
users: to stress test our networks.. ;-)

Rene

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 8:37 PM
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] capacity of squid

Yeah, just read an interesting article about it... it would seem it would
help to make Squid really hum.

Has anyone on the list ran Squid with and without ReiserFS and noticed any
magnitude of difference?

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@squid-cache.org>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] capacity of squid

> On Fri, Mar 16, 2001, Adam Lang wrote:
> > Why reiserFS?
>
> Reiserfs deals with lots-of-small-files and large-directories better
> than traditional UFS based filesystems.
>
>
>
> Adrian
Received on Sat Mar 17 2001 - 05:47:41 MST