Re: [squid-users] icp port problem

From: TomC <livia74@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 20:28:41 +0800

Thanks for your details explanation

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> Squid don't care what digit you type in the ICP port when no-query is
> specified. Using any number is fine. I use 0 to empasis the fact that
> ICP is not used in any way (not even to UDP echo port 7).
>
> --
> Henrik Nordstrom
> Squid Hacker
>
> TomC wrote:
> >
> > Henrik,
> > You mean I should do that?
> > cache_peer hostname sibling 8080 0 proxy-only no-query
> > Thanks
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> >
> > > TomC wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have some question. The squid is compiled with enable cache digest so
> > > > I think the cache peer will communicate with cache digest. But I don't
> > > > know why another system engineer use "3130" instead of "7" in the entry
> > > > "cache peer" as I read the doc of squid that they say that we should use
> > > > "7" if we are not using icp. Why?
> > >
> > > If no-query is specified then it does not matter as the value is not
> > > used. I commonly use 0 when specifying no-query.
> > >
> > > 7 is used when you have a non-ICP peer but still want to query it before
> > > sending requests there (no-query not specified). In such case Squid will
> > > send the ICP queries to port 7 which is the UDP echo port.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Henrik Nordstrom
> > > Squid Hacker
Received on Wed Apr 18 2001 - 06:28:47 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:59:21 MST