Re: [squid-users] Fw: Update on Sattellite

From: <wojtek@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:01:02 +0200 (CEST)

>
> Do you find that the GNU malloc performs better than the one that comes with
> Squid 2.4?

i found gnu malloc in linux 2.2.19 glibc 2.1.3 much worse.
turning memory_pools off ended with 85MB squid process image while max
58MB with memory_pools on
 
> Thank you very much.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Edward Millington
> (Network Administrator & Senior Technical Support Technician)
> Cariaccess Communications Ltd.
> Wildey
> St. Michael
> Barbados
> 1-246-430-7435
> Fax : 1-246-431-0170
> www.cariaccess.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@hem.passagen.se>
> To: "Edward" <edward@cariaccess.com>
> Cc: "squid" <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 5:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Fw: Update on Sattellite
>
>
> > Edward wrote:
> >
> > > Squid must present itself with different ips as it proxy both
> > > networks.
> >
> > Do do that you NEED the tosaddracl patch we talked about earlier, and to
> > use either myport or src ACL types to select which IP address to use on
> > outgoing requests.
> >
> > http_access is only about allowing access to the proxy, not what will
> > happen when the request is indeed accepted.
> >
> > The tosaddracl patch adds other directives allowing you to select which
> > IP or TOS value to use on outgoing connections based on ACL checks.
> >
> > --
> > Henrik Nordstrom
> > Squid Hacker
> >
> >
>
>

-----------------------------------------------
UNIX *is* user friendly.
It is just a bit selective about his friends.
Received on Sun Apr 29 2001 - 11:01:51 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:59:40 MST