Re: [squid-users] Optimal cache_dir L2 value for ReiserFS?

wojtek@3miasto.net wrote:

> > there a similar performance consideration for the ReiserFS file system?
>
> NO. in reiserfs doing something like 1 4096 is even better.

Not unless reiserfs has seriously improved per-directory locking. See
post from Joe.

> > If it matters, this a SMP Linux v2.4.x system running Squid 2.4STABLE1
> > with aufs file access.
> squid will not use much more than one CPU.

But a second CPU will improve things, probably more so on Linux-2.4.

--
Henrik Nordstrom
Squid hacker