[squid-users] squid fails + incremental ping

From: Van Bossche Koen <Koen.VanBossche@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:20:24 +0300

Hi to you all,

I have a weird problem between a local and parent squid. These are some
facts :
- squid fails from one day to the other (see incremental ping for more
info), we rerouted the local towards an other parent without any problems
- it has an incremental ping from local -> parent, not the other way around
- the backup namely local2 has the same problem
- all other locals towards the parent do not have any problem
- I do not think it has anything to do with dns, it's the same on ip and on
hostname

These are my results of a ping :
PING 138.249.118.131 (138.249.118.131) from 138.249.161.4 : 56(84) bytes of
data.
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=0 ttl=249 time=120.9 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=1 ttl=249 time=1261.9 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=2 ttl=249 time=4761.7 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=3 ttl=249 time=8273.0 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=4 ttl=249 time=11760.9 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=5 ttl=249 time=15264.5 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=6 ttl=249 time=18759.7 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=7 ttl=249 time=22280.1 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=8 ttl=249 time=26125.1 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=9 ttl=249 time=29276.6 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=10 ttl=249 time=32758.9 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=11 ttl=249 time=36264.6 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=12 ttl=249 time=39761.8 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=13 ttl=249 time=43255.9 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=14 ttl=249 time=46758.4 ms
64 bytes from 138.249.118.131: icmp_seq=15 ttl=249 time=51098.1 ms

--- 138.249.118.131 ping statistics ---
74 packets transmitted, 17 packets received, 77% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 120.9/25972.7/53754.8 ms

Does anyone have a suggestion or idea? Did anyone have such a incremental
ping in the past and how was it solved?
I'm looking forward to read your suggestions.

BR
Koen Van Bossche
Received on Tue Jul 03 2001 - 03:25:45 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:00:58 MST