Re: [squid-users] [PATCH] aufs fd leak

From: Steve Snyder <swsnyder@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:26:21 -0500

I hope this fix will be posted to the Squid v2.4S2 bugs page in the form of
a patch. Some of us would prefer to run STABLEx+patches rather than CVS
snapshots.

Thanks.

On Monday 03 September 2001 09:35 pm, Brian wrote:
> (Talking to myself again.)
>
> A day later, still no leaks. Looks like this was the problem.
>
> -- Brian
>
> On Sunday 02 September 2001 10:46 pm, Brian wrote:
> > I think we have a winner!
> >
> > storeAufsClose checks to see if there are pending operations on the
> > file and sets a flag, rather than initiates a close, if there are.
> > storeAufsReadDone checks the flag just before returning, but
> > storeAufsOpenDone does not.
> >
> > I'm not sure what triggers an open without a read (an IMS request for a
> > stale object, I suspect -- this squid gets an unusually high number of
> > them), but it hasn't misplaced an FD in the 4 hours I've run this patch
> > so far. I guess I'll know for sure tomorrow.
> >
> > -- Brian
Received on Mon Sep 03 2001 - 21:26:24 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:02:01 MST