Re: [squid-users] NTLM auth vs 2.4 vs 2.5

From: Jerry Murdock <jmurdock@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:49:38 -0400

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chemolli Francesco (USI)" <ChemolliF@GruppoCredit.it>
To: "'Jerry Murdock'" <jmurdock@itraktech.com>; "Squid"
<squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:35 AM
Subject: RE: [squid-users] NTLM auth vs 2.4 vs 2.5

> > Looking to replace MSProxy with Squid at a site.
> > "Transparent" NTLM auth is a
> > near-must unfortuneatly.
> >
> > Is 2.4 with the NTLM patch ready for prime time?
> >
> > Should this wait for 2.5?
>
> I'm runnign 2.5 (CVS NTLM tag) pre-prod. Got as many as 12 million hits
> with high load.

Good to hear. Sounds as if your load is a little higherthan what this site
would be.

> It has some memory leaks and other problems, but if you can afford the
> occasional scheduled downtime you should fare fine.

How much down time? This could easily accomodate a weekly or so reboot.
Should that be sufficient?

Thanks,
Jerry
Received on Wed Sep 12 2001 - 09:50:10 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:02:09 MST