[squid-users] ufs or aufs?

From: <Torsten.Lange@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:56:36 +0100

hi there,

this is a rather philosophical question...

on a single-processor machine, which cache_dir type would you
recommend, ufs or aufs?

my polygraph benchmarks showed that aufs does perform better,
but the cache efficiency drops significantly on high req/s load.

the squid version is 2.3.stable5 on linux 2.4.13

thanks for your input.
Received on Mon Nov 19 2001 - 04:55:43 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:04:18 MST