Re: [squid-users] assertion failed: store_dir_diskd.c:1645: "buf"

> Switch your cache_dir partition to reiserfs. Relax
> and watch everything
  isn't the raw reiserfs is more fast than
  usual reiserfs partition ? ..

> work nicely (probably, a 1000 PCs on a LAN could
> potentially generate a
> lot of traffic--maybe more than your box will
> handle--but if you're only
> hitting a couple of redirectors at any given time
> you should be fine).
  well if the condition like that.. maybe better
  you're using some (2-3) redirector box that
  handles wccp and have some failover mechanism
  incase the redirector box itself failed
  and some cache array located
  on different segment (tunnel mode), each cache
  using different router to internet if throughput
  limited by io / packet not by cpu bound. , using
  wccp to forward packet to respective cache node
  using some schedules that you want.. eg :
  simplest one.. round robind, weighted round
  robin, least connected , etc. :)

  Forward packet by direct routing.. dr
  need, the cache array on same ethernet segment,
  if i not misunderstood the concept.
  or ipip
  tunneling.

  regards

  Budi Aditya..

  junior it staff..
  CV Indosarva Broadband.
  Surabaya, Indonesia

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
Received on Fri Mar 01 2002 - 11:19:14 MST