RE: [squid-users] RE: Cisco content engine & Squid

mån 2003-04-28 klockan 11.11 skrev McWhirter,Julia:
> So now I need to integrate with squid. Our current setup is a Cisco
> content engine (used for http/ftp proxy and cache engine), which is
> adequate at our current user level. OK so I am only considering
> implementing squid to support squidguard. This is the short-term issue
> anyway long term I would like to investigate and optimize the caching.

You can either replace your Cisco with Squid, or chain the two proxies
together.

If chaining you need to decide on which order you want to chain the
proxies, and then configure the proxy closest to your users to use the
other as a parent proxy.

Using both for caching is most likely redundant, so if you want to keep
the Cisco Cache Engine for caching then you should probably configure
Squid without a cache.

Regards
Henrik

-- 
Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful.
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org
Please consult the Squid FAQ and other available documentation before
asking Squid questions, and use the squid-users mailing-list when no
answer can be found. Private support questions is only answered
for a fee or as part of a commercial Squid support contract.
If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid and
firewall appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden
http://www.marasystems.com/, info@marasystems.com