Re: [squid-users] Squid, WCCP, transparent proxy

From: Masood Ahmad Shah <masood@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:34:31 +0500

hmmmm if you have just single cache for your network then no need to run
WCCP ... I will suggest better to redirect port 80 traffic to your cache
simple is that. and of course iptables or ipchains will redirect your
traffic.

-- 
Best Regs,
Masood Ahmad Shah
System Administrator
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
|   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|   Fibre Net (Pvt) Ltd. Lahore, Pakistan
|   Tel: +92-42-6677024
|   Mobile: +92-300-4277367
|   http://www.fibre.net.pk
|   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Mena" <rt_mena@yahoo.com>
To: "fooler" <fooler@skyinet.net>; <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid, WCCP, transparent proxy
| Hi Fooler,
|
| Thanks for the reply.
|
| How stable is this wccp daemon ?
|
| If squid would be used in the same machine would I be
| able to do this proxy without the wccp ?
|
| - rt
|
| --- fooler <fooler@skyinet.net> wrote:
| >
| > ----- Original Message -----
| > From: "Robert Mena" <rt_mena@yahoo.com>
| > To: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@squid-cache.org>;
| > <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
| > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:22 AM
| > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid, WCCP, transparent
| > proxy
| >
| >
| > > The actual Squid is a separate machine.
| > >
| > > What would be the normal interceptation ?
| >
| > since your router is separated from your squid
| > machine and you wanted to
| > have a wccp on your linux router box, all you need
| > is a wccp daemon... you
| > can get this at http://wccpd.sourceforge.net/
| >
| > > iptables
| > > with a redirect option ?
| >
| > yup since iptables is the latest firewall program
| > for linux...
| >
| >
| > > what would you suggest to have some sort of
| > failover
| > > mechanism.  Suppose squid goes down it would
| > forward
| > > the requests...
| >
| > if you have a working wccp, then thats the point of
| > wccp :->
| >
| > fooler.
| >
| >
| >
|
|
| __________________________________
| Do you Yahoo!?
| Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
| http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
|
Received on Mon Aug 04 2003 - 22:35:07 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:18:36 MST