Re: [squid-users] squid + axel

On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 21:48, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > Ermm, you don't need bonding for load balancing here: A simple /32 route
> > on each dial up interface in the ISP, and propogated using some IGP (one
> > ISP needed) will allow traffic to be roughly-distributed over multiple
> > links with disparate IP's.
>
> True, but bonding makes life considerably easier for all parties involved
> escpecially in dial-up situations where the links are not dedicated at the
> ISP.

Not significantly IMO, standard proportional-weighted routing is pretty
easy to setup :}.

> Note: I count multilink-PPP as a form of bonding in this discussion.

Yep, so do I.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.