Re: [squid-users] what is probably my last problem (well, we'll see *G*) tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.31

From: Brian Hechinger <wonko@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 09:21:10 -0400

On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:58:06PM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> > 2003/08/28 08:15:36| comm_accept: FD 11: (130) Software caused
> > connection abort 2003/08/28 08:15:36| httpAccept: FD 11: accept
> > failure: (130) Software caused connection abort 2003/08/28
> > 08:48:17| comm_accept: FD 11: (130) Software caused connection
> > abort 2003/08/28 08:48:17| httpAccept: FD 11: accept failure: (130)
> > Software caused connection abort
>
> Most likely clients aborting the request while setting up the
> connection to the cache. Considered harmless.

ok, good.

> > 2003/08/28 11:38:22| squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue
> > congestion
>
> A few of these is nothing to worry about. If you get very many (i.e.
> as many to make the message annoying due to the sheer amount of it)
> then you probably have too few hard drives for the I/O load Squid is
> having and you may consider adding one drive more for better
> performance.

ok, so once we transition to squid, i can redo all four disks for squid and
this should happen less, hopefully.

thanks!!!

-brian

-- 
"You know, evil comes in many forms, be it a man-eating cow or Joseph Stalin.
But you can't let the package hide the pudding. Evil is just plain bad! You
don't cotton to it! You gotta smack it on the nose with the rolled up newspaper
of goodness! Bad dog! Bad dog!"		-- The Tick
Received on Tue Sep 02 2003 - 07:21:11 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:19:29 MST