[squid-users] Re:[squid-users] Large scale Transparent proxy setup

From: unixware <datareactor@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:56:06 -0800 (PST)

Thanks for yr reply

Yes you are right .

other thing i want to ask

is squid-3 is stable for production use ?
when squid-3 stable release is comming out.

is kernel 2.5 and 2.6 have builtin epoll support ?

Thanks and Regards

UW

> >
> > > i am thinking running squid on port 80 .so i can
> skip
> > > the iptables . any drawback running squid on
> port 80
> > > ???
> >
> > Squid don't really care, but it won't help you get
> rid of the iptables
> > requirement for transparent interception. The
> interception is primarily
> > about the destination IP address, not the port.
> >
> > > next i am thinking how to improve squid network
> I/O
> >
> > Then you should most likely look into the
> epoll/kpoll support in Squid-3
> > which attempts to address the major bottlenecks of
> squids network I/O on
> > larger scale servers. Without these the CPU usage
> skyrockets as the number
> > of concurrent connections increases.
> >
> > Regards
> > Henrik
> >
> >
>

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
Received on Wed Dec 10 2003 - 08:56:19 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 12:00:09 MST