Re: [squid-users] Proxy not caching and DEAD/REVIVED parent (and signal 6 error solved)

From: Henrik Nordstrom <>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:39:41 +0100 (CET)

On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, [iso-8859-2] Éliás [iso-8859-2] Tamás wrote:

> there are FIRST_PARENT_MISSes in it. The child proxy should not save the data
> getting through? I don't belive that. Or I should make not a parent-chil
> relationship between them, only two ordianry, standalone proxies?

Normally a child caches data unless you explicitly forbid it to.

What does the cache_peer line on the child look like?

And exacly what does access.log say? I am looking for the full status
code not the hierarchy code.

Also verify that the URL and request your are looking at is cacheable.

Received on Tue Feb 24 2004 - 00:40:59 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 12:00:03 MST