Re: [squid-users] Squid performance issue [again]

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 08:06:23 +0200

On 17.05 17:47, Andreas Pettersson wrote:
> If the performance among the disks is about equal then cache performance is
> significant better with 5 x 20G disks instead of 1 x 100G. How they are
> partinioned doesn't matter.

It does matter. partitioning disks used for cache can decrease
performance, as long as squid's ans FS optimalization will try to defeat
each other.

If you can use whole disk for squid cache, do not split it into
partitions.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The 3 biggets disasters: Hiroshima 45, Tschernobyl 86, Windows 95
Received on Tue May 18 2004 - 00:06:26 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Jun 01 2004 - 12:00:01 MDT