Re: [squid-users] ext3 vs reiser

From: Hendrik Voigtländer <hendrik@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 11:14:33 +0200

Additionally I would recommend to use some non-default mount-option for
the cache-disks. (notail, noatime)
Check this:
http://www.devshed.com/c/a/Administration/High-Performance-Web-Caching-With-Squid

Hendrik Voigtländer

Raymond A. Meijer wrote:

> On Thu 20 May 2004 11:11, Hement Gopal wrote:
>
>
>>we're building a new squid server.....just needed to know if we should
>>use reiser fs or ext3?
>>can we reiser the cache01 and cache02 disks and ext3 the root disk?
>
>
> Yes. That's how we run our Squid proxy.
>
> Using ReiserFS instead of Ext3 on the cache disks showed a significant
> performance boost/lower load.
>
>
> Ray
Received on Thu May 20 2004 - 03:15:09 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Jun 01 2004 - 12:00:02 MDT