I agree with the power fo rpm, but still i think that
compiling from the actual code gives you more options
to control and configure.
--- Elsen Marc <elsen@imec.be> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > It should do fine, depending how to squid.conf is
> > written. But....ding! dong!, rpm is for as you
> said
> > newbies, one should always configure from src, to
> have
> > more flexiblity and better performance.
>
> Ding dong !,Boink ! Kadoeeiing... One of your bells
> just fell out of the it's tower.
> The power and flexibility of rpm as a tool
> for managing sw. packages on in consistent manner,
> doesn't
> always make it oriented towards newbies.
> Often for SQUID however there's need to :
>
> - use options to squid which may not have
> been built (added)
> when a specific rpm was made
> - use the latest version of SQUID when no rpm
> is available.
>
>
> M.
>
=====
Regards,
Mohsin Khan
CCNA ( Cisco Certified Network Associate 2.0 )
http://pk.aaghaz.net
>>>Happy is the one who can smile<<<
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Received on Tue Aug 03 2004 - 00:58:36 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Sep 01 2004 - 12:00:01 MDT