Re: [squid-users] No TCP_HIT, just TCP_MISS, why?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:13:52 +0200 (CEST)

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:

> In what way is the "ufs" cache_dir type broken? I do see TCP_HIT/200
> entries in access.log.

http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE6-ufs_no_valid_dir

Regards
Henrik
Received on Wed Sep 29 2004 - 11:13:56 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "RE: [squid-users] Squid as a reverse proxy"
Previous message: Elsen Marc: "RE: [squid-users] No TCP_HIT, just TCP_MISS, why?"
In reply to: Merton Campbell Crockett: "Re: [squid-users] No TCP_HIT, just TCP_MISS, why?"
Next in thread: Elsen Marc: "RE: [squid-users] No TCP_HIT, just TCP_MISS, why?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 12:00:03 MDT