Re: [squid-users] strange reports after dl-malloc

From: sk <suresh.kumar@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:15:52 +0700

Yeah Satellite link

But could someone explain why load shoots up even when permissible number of
FD's are opened.

have configured for 4096 and near 1000 open FD's the cpu is in 90's.

Also could kernel 2.6 help me improve the performance.

SK

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Robertson" <crobertson@gci.com>
To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:44 AM
Subject: RE: [squid-users] strange reports after dl-malloc

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sk [mailto:suresh.kumar@online.com.kh]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 11:22 PM
> > To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> > Subject: [squid-users] strange reports after dl-malloc
> >
> >
> > Median Service Times (seconds) 5 min 60 min:
> > HTTP Requests (All): 0.72387 0.68577
> > Cache Misses: 1.31166 1.24267
> > Cache Hits: 0.00286 0.00463
> > Near Hits: 1.24267 1.24267
> > Not-Modified Replies: 0.00286 0.00286
> > DNS Lookups: 0.39726 0.61955
> > ICP Queries: 0.00000 0.00000
> >
>
> Is it safe to assume that you are accessing the internet over satellite?
>
> >
> > After all hard work still with 90-100 requests /sec squid hovers around
> 98%
> > CPU.
> > Any advice.
> >
> > RGDS
> > SK
>
> Latency seems to make a great deal of difference to Squid's CPU usage.
The
> majority of my customers are accessing the internet using satellite
> connections, and you can see my stats at
> http://mrtg.schoolaccess.net/squid/. A peak of about 68 req/s
> (http://mrtg.schoolaccess.net/squid/proxy1serverrequests-day.png) leads to
> about 60% CPU
(http://mrtg.schoolaccess.net/squid/proxy1syscpustat-day.png).
> For the record, the monitored servers are parents that have terrestrial
> links to the world. Most of their children are accessing the parents over
> satellite.
>
> Chris
>
Received on Fri Dec 10 2004 - 01:15:42 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 12:00:02 MST