[squid-users] Re: storage rebuild slow with reiserfs

From: Maik Ihde <maik.ihde@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:27:14 +0000 (UTC)

Martin Marji Cermak <mc1 <at> trimedia.cz> writes:

>
> Hello,
> I have two 36 GB, 10 rpm scsi disk dedicated to Squid.2.5.STABLE7.
> No raid.Adaptec 29320LP Ultra320 SCSI adapter, SEAGATE ST336607LW

Our setup is quite different since we have 2 15krpm Disks configured as a stripe
set and are using diskd...
 
> 2005/02/01 16:12:38| 0 Swapfile clashes avoided.
> 2005/02/01 16:12:38| Took 864.1 seconds (3441.4 objects/sec).

However we had a power failure today and so squid was restarted, it took 168
seconds (18.022,9 obj/sec) for about 3 Million entries. The Squid partition is
about 36 GB of Size.

So that's quite different. From what I have learned in the past ReiserFS should
be faster than ext3 when it comes to lots of small files in lots of dirs...

Kind Regards
Maik
Received on Wed Feb 02 2005 - 09:30:58 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Mar 01 2005 - 12:00:01 MST