[squid-users] Why using LRU?

From: Michael Scheibel <squid-temp@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:00:39 +0200 (MEST)

Hello!

Why is LRU still the default replacement policy; others seem to perform much
better in terms of hit ratios.

http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/1999/HPL-1999-69.html even suggests lower
cpu utilization:

"The results indicate that the heap-based implementation of the GDSF and
LFUDA policies consume less user and system CPU time than the original LRU
replacement policy in Squid 2. Interestingly the heap-based LRU
implementation also consumes less CPU time than the original list-based LRU
implementation."

Some comments would be fine!

Regards,
 Michael

-- 
+++ NEU: GMX DSL_Flatrate! Schon ab 14,99 EUR/Monat! +++
GMX Garantie: Surfen ohne Tempo-Limit! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Received on Wed Apr 20 2005 - 07:00:41 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun May 01 2005 - 12:00:04 MDT