Re: [squid-users] Windows 2003 FS Question

From: Serassio Guido <guido.serassio@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:39:11 +0200

Hi,

At 18.17 12/08/2005, Shortridge, Mark wrote:

>Hi all,
>I just have a simple question, I hope. I'm running SquidNT 2.5 Stable 10 on
>a Windows 2003 server. I was wondering which fs has better performance for
>squid on a windows server platform, ufs or awin32? UFS is the default, but
>if I could get better performance out of awin32 I would want to change. I
>have found very little information on awin32 on the internet. Any input or
>experiences with these fs types on SquidNT would be very helpful.

awin32 is an aufs clone based on Windows native threads, so
performance gains should be similar.

But I have got some recent report about awin32 problems on Windows
2003 SP1. Because I'm still investigating about, it should be more
safe for now select the ufs fs on Windows 2003.

Regards

Guido

-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: guido.serassio@acmeconsulting.it
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
Received on Fri Aug 12 2005 - 11:39:35 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Sep 01 2005 - 12:00:01 MDT